[Bug 8860] New: Should other values of "overflow" property be allowed for the "table-overflow" property

[b***@wiggum.w3.org]

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8860

Summary: Should other values of "overflow" property be allowed
for the "table-overflow" property
Product: XSLFO
Version: 2.0 Working Draft
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XSL-FO
AssignedTo: ***@w3.org
ReportedBy: ***@w3.org
QAContact: xsl-***@w3.org


Should other values of "overflow" property be allowed for the
"table-overflow" property, e.g. "visible", "hidden", "scroll", and
"error-if-overflow"?

[taken from an open issue in the draft]

[b***@wiggum.w3.org]

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8860


Edward Jiang <***@att.net> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |***@att.net




--- Comment #1 from Edward Jiang <***@att.net> 2010-03-31 17:57:28 ---
Recommend to support following value for "table-overflow" property:

hidden
======

When the table width is beyond parent area's width, the overflowed part is
hidden


scroll
======

On some rendering agents that target XSL:FO output to browser or other media
that supports scrolling, if the table width is beyond the parent area's width,
a Horizontal scroll bar is provided underneath the table to support horizontal
scrolling.
For other rendering agents that target for printing, this value will be ignored
and the agents will treat property as set to be "auto" and use the default
behavior.