b***@jessica.w3.org
2011-08-18 14:33:18 UTC
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13827
Summary: Do cie-lab-color() and cie-lchab-color() need optional
white point?
Product: XSLFO
Version: 2.0 Working Draft
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XSL-FO
AssignedTo: ***@mentea.net
ReportedBy: ***@mentea.net
QAContact: xsl-***@w3.org
XSL FO 2.0's cie-lab-color() and cie-lchab-color() [1] are meant to be
compatible with what can be expressed in SVG Color 1.2 [2].
The cielab() and cielchab() functions in SVG Color 1.2 both have an option
white point parameter.
Should XSL FO 2.0 have this parameter in its functions?
Regards,
Tony Graham.
[1] http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/Group/2009/03/xslfo20.html#d2e7142
[2] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/modules/color/master/SVGColor.html
Summary: Do cie-lab-color() and cie-lchab-color() need optional
white point?
Product: XSLFO
Version: 2.0 Working Draft
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XSL-FO
AssignedTo: ***@mentea.net
ReportedBy: ***@mentea.net
QAContact: xsl-***@w3.org
XSL FO 2.0's cie-lab-color() and cie-lchab-color() [1] are meant to be
compatible with what can be expressed in SVG Color 1.2 [2].
The cielab() and cielchab() functions in SVG Color 1.2 both have an option
white point parameter.
Should XSL FO 2.0 have this parameter in its functions?
Regards,
Tony Graham.
[1] http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/Group/2009/03/xslfo20.html#d2e7142
[2] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/modules/color/master/SVGColor.html
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.