[Bug 13804] New: Is normative rgb-icc() prototype wrong?

[b***@jessica.w3.org]

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13804

Summary: Is normative rgb-icc() prototype wrong?
Product: XSLFO
Version: 1.1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XSL-FO
AssignedTo: ***@mentea.net
ReportedBy: ***@mentea.net
QAContact: xsl-***@w3.org


The rgb-icc() prototype [1] in the normative HTML for XSL 1.1 is:

color rgb-icc(numeric, numeric, numeric, NCName, numeric, numeric)

However, the non-normative XML source [2] for XSL 1.1 contains:

<proto name="rgb-icc" return-type="color"><arg type="numeric"/><arg
type="numeric"/>
<arg type="numeric"/><arg type="NCName"/><arg type="numeric"/><arg
type="numeric" occur="rep"/></proto>

I.e., the 'occur="rep"' on the last <arg> does not make it any different from
an <arg> without it.

In contrast 'occur="opt"' adds a "?" after the argument in the rendered
prototype. E.g., in 'system-font()'.

Was 'occur="rep"' supposed to add a "+" after the argument name in the rendered
prototype?

Regards,


Tony Graham ***@mentea.net
Consultant http://www.mentea.net
Mentea 13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
XML, XSL FO and XSLT consulting, training and programming

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl11/#expr-color-functions
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xsl11-20061205/xslspec.xml