Discussion:
[Bug 6280] New: Explicit breaks on table-header and -footer
b***@wiggum.w3.org
2008-12-04 16:45:54 UTC
Permalink
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6280

Summary: Explicit breaks on table-header and -footer
Product: XSLFO
Version: 1.1
Platform: All
URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-
editors/2007AprJun/0000
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XSL-FO
I don't think it makes much sense to set the break-before and
break-after properties on fo:table-row and children of fo:table-cell
which are themselves children of fo:table-header and fo:table-footer
elements. It might be helpful to explicitely state that in the
descriptions of break-before and break-after.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
b***@wiggum.w3.org
2008-12-04 16:59:04 UTC
Permalink
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6280


Tony Graham <***@MenteithConsulting.com> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |6281
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
b***@wiggum.w3.org
2009-01-13 12:45:04 UTC
Permalink
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6280


Tony Graham <***@MenteithConsulting.com> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |***@gmail.com




--- Comment #1 from Tony Graham <***@MenteithConsulting.com> 2009-01-13 12:45:03 ---
Adding original poster as CC since response will be required when a solution is
proposed.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
b***@jessica.w3.org
2010-06-03 15:51:38 UTC
Permalink
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6280


Liam R E Quin <***@w3.org> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |***@w3.org
AssignedTo|***@gmail.com |***@MenteithConsult
| |ing.com




--- Comment #2 from Liam R E Quin <***@w3.org> 2010-06-03 15:51:38 ---
We agree.

At the end of 7.20.1 "break-after" add,

This property has no effect when it appears on a descendant of fo:table-header
or fo:table-footer.

Similarly for 7.20.2 "break-before".

This property has no effect when it appears on a descendant of fo:table-header
or fo:table-footer.


This does not take into account the corner-case of a break inside a table
header when table-omit-header-at-break is true - i.e. a break inside a table
header or footer that does not repeat is now disallowed.

I have marked this issue as closed; if you feel the resolution is
unsatisfactory please reopen it (and say why!)

Thank you
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
b***@jessica.w3.org
2010-06-03 15:52:12 UTC
Permalink
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6280


Liam R E Quin <***@w3.org> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Loading...